accessibilityalertarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upclosedigital-transformationdiversitydownloaddrivedropboxeventsexitexpandfacebookguideinstagramjob-pontingslanguage-selectorlanguagelinkedinlocationmailmenuminuspencilphonephotoplayplussearchsharesoundshottransactionstwitteruploadwebinarwp-searchwt-arrowyoutube

European commission issues its first resale price maintenance decisions in over a decade fining four consumer electronics manufacturers for fixing online resale prices – monitoring software and pricing algorithms played a role.

On 24 July 2018, the European Commission (“Commission”) fined, in four separate decisions, consumer electronics manufacturers Asus, Denon & Marantz, Philips and Pioneer for imposing fixed or minimum resale prices on their online retailers. The total fine imposed on the four manufacturers amounts to more than EUR 111 million.

The infringements related to a variety of consumer electronics such as kitchen appliances, notebooks and hi-fi products. The four manufacturers were found to have intervened with online retailers who offered their products at low prices. If those retailers did not respect the prices requested by the manufacturers, they faced – according to the decisions – threats or sanctions such as blocked supplies. Pioneer had also limited the ability of its retailers to sell cross-border to consumers in other Member States in order to sustain different resale prices in different Member States.

Resale price maintenance issues as such are not new. The four Commission decisions imposing substantial fines on the consumer electronics manufacturers are nevertheless highly relevant, in particular for businesses engaging in e-commerce.

The Commission’s press release highlights that monitoring software and pricing algorithms played an important role in the assessment of the cases although the use of these tools in itself was not found to infringe EU competition law:

  • First, the Commission found that the use of sophisticated monitoring tools allowed the manufacturers to effectively track resale prices and to intervene swiftly in case of deviations from the imposed prices.
  • Secondly, the Commission emphasized that the resale price restrictions imposed on certain online retailers had a broader impact on the overall online price level in the industry as most online retailers use pricing algorithms which automatically adapt retail prices to those of competitors.

As to the level of fines, the Commission granted reductions ranging from 40% to 50% as the four companies had provided evidence with significant added value and had expressly acknowledged the facts and the infringement. This is interesting as the Commission’s leniency and settlement procedures, which both provide for reductions of fines, are limited to horizontal cartels and do not apply to vertical restraints such as resale price maintenance. The Commission nevertheless granted reductions of fines in the present vertical cases to reward the companies’ cooperation.

The Commission decisions mark the first time the Commission has issued a decision addressing resale price maintenance in more than a decade (for the past years, the Commission had left the enforcement of resale price maintenance and other vertical restraints to the national competition authorities). The four decisions follow the Commission’s comprehensive e-commerce sector inquiry, the results of which were published in May 2017 and have led the Commission to open a number of investigations into online sales practices. Besides the four decisions issued on 24 July 2018, further investigations are ongoing and concern geo-blocking practices, price discrimination based on consumers’ locations and restrictions of cross-border and online sales of merchandising products.
 

Read the full text

Download PDF
3 August 2020

Resale price maintenance in the digital age

European commission issues its first resale price maintenance decisions in over a decade fining four consumer electronics manufacturers for fixing online resale prices – monitoring software and pricing algorithms played a role. On 24 July 2018, the European Commission (“Commission”) fined, in four separate decisions, consumer electronics manufacturers Asus, Denon & Marantz, Philips and Pioneer […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Romanian energy regulatory authority (“Anre”) has set the mandatory quota for the acquisition of green certificates

Order no. 158/2018 on the establishment of the estimated mandatory quota for the acquisition of green certificates for the period August-December 2018 (“Order no. 158/2018”), issued by the President of ANRE and published in the Official Journal no. 666 of 31 July 2018 came into effect on 1 August 2018. Order no. 158/2018 was issued […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Update zum WiEReG

Die gesetzliche Frist für die erstmalige Meldung zum Wirtschaftliche Eigentümer Register ist am 1.6.2018 abgelaufen. Mit Informationsschreiben vom 14.5.2018 (GZ.: BMF-460000/0010-III/6/2018) hat das BMF als Registerbehörde mitgeteilt, dass der erste Lauf des automationsunterstützten Zwangsstrafenverfahrens auf den 16.8.2018 verschoben wird. Faktisch war dies eine Verlängerung der Meldefrist für die erstmaligen Meldungen an das Register der wirtschaftlichen […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Austrian DPA issues blacklist

Regulation on Processing Operations for which a Data Protection Impact Assessment must be carried out On November 9th 2018, the Austrian Data Protection Authority issued a list stipulating data processing operations that in all cases require a data protection impact assessment (“DPIA”). Under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) the controller must carry out […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

GDPR – Six months after entry into force – Introduction of GDPR to Polish law

It has been more than half a year since the entry into force of “GDPR”, i.e., Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Poland regulates the legal situation of certain financial market participants after a hard Brexit

The President of Poland signed the Act on the rules of conduct of business of certain financial market entities in relation to the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the “UK”) from the European Union without agreement referred to in Article 50 section 2 of the Treaty on European Union […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

E-Commerce platforms in the focus of the CJEU / E-Commerce Plattformen im Fokus des EUGH

E-commerce platforms are not obligated in all cases to make a telephone number available to consumers before the conclusion of the contract – there are other options. E-Commerce Plattformen sind nicht verpflichtet, dem Verbraucher vor Vertragsabschluss stets die Telefonnummer zur Verfügung zu stellen – es gibt auch andere Optionen. In its decision C-649/19 the CJEU […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Croatian ultimate beneficial owners register: Deadline – 31 December 2019

In line with the EU’s 4th AML Directive, Croatia has imposed an obligation on all locally established legal entities to register their ultimate beneficial owner(s) with a newly established register by 31 December 2019. The register is intended to increase transparency in business and combat money laundering & terrorist financing. Similar efforts are underway or […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

Neues schweizerisches Prospektrecht bringt “Passporting”-Möglichkeit für EU-Wertpapierprospekte

Das schweizerische Prospektrecht, das in vielen Belangen veraltet ist, wurde ab dem 1. Januar 2020 durch die Einführung des Finanzdienstleistungsgesetzes (FIDLEG) grundlegend erneuert und stark an internationale Standards, insbesondere das Prospektrecht der EU, angeglichen. Die Kollegen von Schellenberg Wittmer waren so freundlich, die wesentlichsten Neuerungen kurz zusammenzufassen. Um mehr zu erfahren, öffnen Sie bitte das […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

The guide to M&A arbitration – The taking of evidence

Andrea Gritsch, Stefan Riegler and Alexander Zollner authored a chapter in the 2nd edition of the GAR Guide to M&A Arbitration. Their contribution, “The Taking of Evidence”, offers a comprehensive overview on topics which arise frequently in M&A arbitrations, such as burden and standard of proof issues, access to documentary evidence, fact witnesses and expert […]...

Read more
3 August 2020

The Inward Investment and International Taxation Review – Tenth edition: Austria

Austria, one of the wealthiest countries in the world and a European Union (EU) Member State, continues to attract investors owing to its stable political and social situation and its geographical position in the centre of Europe. Apart from proximity, historical ties to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) have made Austria a […]...

Read more