accessibilityalertarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upclosedigital-transformationdiversitydownloaddrivedropboxeventsexitexpandfacebookguideinstagramjob-pontingslanguage-selectorlanguagelinkedinlocationmailmenuminuspencilphonephotoplayplussearchsharesoundshottransactionstwitteruploadwebinarwp-searchwt-arrowyoutube

The first amendment to implement the EU Trademark Directive (see our Client Alert “Trademark Offensive 2017”) entered into force in September 2017. It created, among others, the possibility of splitting trademark applications and registrations, introduced the national certification mark and simplified formal requirements for changes to the register. Since 1 September 2018, the new calculation method for the term of protection has also been in force, whereby trademark protection ends ten years after the date of filing instead of at the end of the month of the trademark registration.

With the second amendment, the EU Trademark Directive will now be fully implemented in the Austrian MSchG. In addition to a new trademark definition, the amendment also fortifies the position of the trademark owner by introducing additional grounds for opposition and cancellation as well as a new prohibition right to prevent the transit of infringing goods through Austria.

The two amendments considerably strengthen Austrian trademark law and significantly increase national trademark protection; a development that reflects the ever-increasing importance of trademark and intellectual property law.

MODERNIZED TRADEMARK CONCEPT

The Union Trademark Regulation EU 2009/207 already abolished the requirement of graphic representability of a sign when applying for a Union trademark. However, from 14 January 2019, this requirement will also no longer apply to national applications. The amendment to the trademark concept of Section 1 MSchG shall facilitate the registration of new unconventional trademarks such as sound, motion and multimedia trademarks. Now, trademarks can be represented in any way as long as the desired protection of the owner is clearly identifiable.

In addition to the amendment of the concept of a trademark, the amendment lists out new grounds for absolute refusal. According to Section 4 MSchG, geographical indications, traditional terms for the protection of wines, signs for the protection of traditional specialties and plant variety rights which are protected under EU law or international conventions cannot be registered as trademarks.

PROTECTION AGAINST PRODUCT PIRACY

Until now it was possible for product pirates to transport infringing goods through the customs territory as long as they were not sold directly to consumers. With the implementation of the EU Trademark Directive, trademark owners will be able to prohibit the transit of infringing goods through Austrian federal territory in accordance with Section 10 para 2b item (2) MSchG if the goods and their packaging originate from third countries and contain a largely identical trademark which is used without the owner’s consent. However, this prohibition only covers products that are recognisable to customs authorities as ‘obviously infringing’.

CHANGES IN EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

The most striking changes can be found in the extension of the grounds for opposition and cancellation. According to new Section 29a para 1 MSchG an opposition can be based not only on identical or similar trademarks but also on nationally and internationally well-known trademarks or designations of origin and geographical indications. Likewise, an opposition may be based on several trademarks provided that they belong to the same proprietor. According to Section 29a para 1a MSchG, an opposition can also only be directed against a part of the list of goods and services of the challenged trademark.

In cancellation proceedings, the position of the trademark owner is strengthened to the effect that the proprietor of the earlier trademark shall furnish proof that his trademark has been put to genuine use during the five-year period preceding the date of the application for a declaration of invalidity (Sec. 30 (6) MSchG). With the implementation of the amendment it will also be possible to base a cancellation request on a mere trademark application; however, this will only be granted if the trademark is registered before the cancellation decision (Sec. 30 para 2a MSchG).  There are also new relative grounds for cancellation. Among others, persons who are entitled to injunction claims against the use of the trademark under the Copyright Act (Sec. 32b MSchG) or the Design Protection Act (Sec. 32c MSchG) may also apply for cancellation of the trademark.

CHEAPER PROCEDURAL FEES OF THE PATENT OFFICE

In order to promote electronic procedural steps by means of e-government services, the online bonus already valid for national trademark applications will also be extended to patent, design and international trademark applications. This bonus is intended to serve as an incentive for electronic applications, which can be processed much more easily and quickly by the Patent Office. Furthermore, only one fee will be charged for several identical applications for changes of name or company name in the trademark register.

The fees for applications before the Nullity Division of the Patent Office will be significantly reduced. Fees for applications for cancellation of trademarks are reduced to EUR 550 instead of EUR 700. The reductions in procedural fees, which have so far been significantly higher than their European counterparts is intended to considerably ease access to the legal protection system.

NEW E-FILING SYSTEM OF THE AUSTRIAN PATENT OFFICE (APO)

From January 2019, the APO will offer a new system for online registration of national trade marks. This system will be similar to the EUIPO E-Filing system and will enable the filing of new types of trademarks.

Furthermore, the APO is working on a new E-Filing system for the registration of IR trademarks, which will also be available from January 2019. This system was developed in cooperation with WIPO and complements the currently available paper procedure by a simplified electronic application system.

WHEN DOES THE TRADEMARK AMENDMENT COME INTO FORCE?

The amendments to the Austrian Trademark Act (MSchG) were published in BGBl I No. 91/2018 and entered into force on 14 January 2019.

Read the full text

Download PDF

Read the full text

Download PDF
31 July 2020

Trademark offensive 2.0 – Full adoption of the EU trademark directive in January 2019

Following the implementation of several new provisions of Austrian trademark law in 2017, the second amendment completely implements the EU Trademark Directive in the Austrian Trademark Act (MSchG). It modernizes the concept of trademarks in Austrian law and eases access to the legal protection system. The amendment to the Austrian Trademark Act entered into force on 14 January 2019....

Read more
31 July 2020

Serbia: Companies to register UBOs by 31 January

On 31 December 2018, the Central Register of Ultimate Beneficial Owners (“Central Register”) has been established with the Serbian Business Register Agency (“BRA”). Serbian companies, institutions, as well as branches and representative offices established by foreign investors in Serbia, are among the entities designated by the Serbian Law on Central Register as entities whose legal […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

AML in Bulgaria: New deadlines

On 8th of January 2019 the Rules for Implementation of the Anti-Money Laundering Act (in Bulgarian: Правилник за прилагане на Закона за мерките срещу изпирането на пари) have been published. This is the key piece of legislation that was missing from the framework introduced into the Bulgarian law with the transposition of 4th EU AML […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Amendments of the trade unions act

On 1 January 2019, important amendments of the Trade Unions Act came into force enabling individuals engaged under civil law contracts, in particular contractors or self-employed individuals, to set up or join trade unions, provided that such individuals do not employ other persons for the same kind of work they perform for the employer. Consequently, […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Upcoming changes to employment documentation

The Polish Parliament has adopted an act that became effective 1 January 2019 and shortens the retention period of human resource files and allows them to be stored in an electronic form. HOW LONG TO STORE EMPLOYMENT DOCUMENTATION? Former law required employers to store documentation related to an employee and the employment relationship (“employee documentation”) […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Austrian GDPR-tracker: Data protection authority on erasure by way of anonymization

Destruction or anonymization of personal data – an appropriate way to comply with the right to erasure? The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DPA) has further consolidated its case law on the right to erasure. Following decisions on the relationship between erasure obligations and legal retention periods as well as on the storage of contact data […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Bulgaria: Government to launch concession procedures for major transport infrastructure projects

The Bulgarian Council of Ministers adopts an amitious action plan for State Concessions 2019-2020, providing the launch of tenders for major ports and airports. In the context of the pending procedure for Concession of Sofia Airport, the Bulgarian Government affirmed its interest in developing public-private partnerships through concessions in the next couple of years. On […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

New interpretative judgment of the Bulgarian supreme court of cassation on insolvency matters

On 03 December 2018, the Bulgarian Supreme Court of Cassation (“SCC”) published an interpretative judgement under case No. 1/2017 (the “Judgment”), where the Court provides long awaited guidance concerning insolvency proceedings. The Judgment addresses nine questions which were inconsistently resolved by lower courts. Bulgaria has been widely criticized for its inefficient and unreliable insolvency proceedings, […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Romania: New law 362/2018 on the security of network and information systems / NIS directive

EU Directive 2016/1148 on Security of Network and Information Systems (the “NIS Directive”) regulates the main EU legislative framework, which aims to achieve a high common level of network and information systems security across the European Union. The NIS Directive applies to so-called Operators of Essential Services (“OESs”) acting in sectors that heavily rely on […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Czech Republic implements EU trademark directive

What does this mean for my business? The Czech Republic has implemented EU Trademark Directive No. 2015/2436 by way of amending the Czech Trademark Act No. 441/2003, effective as of 1 January 2019. The most important changes can be summarized as follows: Trademarks do not need to be capable of graphic representation in the trademark […]...

Read more
31 July 2020

Bulgaria to implement the EU trade secrets directive

Substantive protection and enhanced procedural framework covering goods and services, business need to implement trade secrets strategies, including identification, protection measures and structure properly potential claims....

Read more
31 July 2020

GDPR: The Czech Republic has finally adopted national legislation

On 12 March 2019, the Czech Republic approved a legislation incorporating the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation ’GDPR’ (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). The Chamber of Deputies approved the final version of the Data Processing Act repealing the previous Act No. 101/2000 Coll. (Personal Data Protection) that was partly inapplicable from the day the GDPR came into force (25 May 2018). Along with the Data Processing Act, minor changes to dozens of statutes concerning personal data processing were also passed....

Read more