accessibilityalertarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upclosedigital-transformationdiversitydownloaddrivedropboxeventsexitexpandfacebookguideinstagramjob-pontingslanguage-selectorlanguagelinkedinlocationmailmenuminuspencilphonephotoplayplussearchsharesoundshottransactionstwitteruploadwebinarwp-searchwt-arrowyoutube

Some background

The high level of risk exposure in energy trading along with the substantial value of deals in this sector have necessitated new rules on transparency and stability for the European energy markets similar to those of  financial markets.

For the first time, energy traders in Bulgaria confronted the challenge of complying with regulation of their activity by prohibiting energy market manipulation rules and introducing REMIT and requirements that they register with the Bulgarian Energy and Water Regulatory Commission (EWRC) and provide a record of their wholesale energy market transactions, including the energy derivatives.

Prior to REMIT, only the transactions with energy derivatives carried out by investment firms as part of their main activities were governed by the rules of the financial markets, provided in the Law on financial instruments markets, transposing MiFID I into Bulgarian national legislation.

The road map to regulatory compliance for energy traders continued with EMIR – a typical financial regulation which, however, directly affected energy traders and brought their activities closer to those of investment firms. In Bulgaria, the practical application of EMIR led mainly to LEI code identification of all energy traders because of their classification as non-financial counterparties (NFC)  under EMIR.

With the adoption of MiFID II, it became clear that the tendency tor rely on financial regulation to ensure transparency in energy markets will further continue. This directive extended the scope of application of the financial rules by covering(i) new energy products contracts, (ii) new trading venues and (iii) new parties trading such products. The fundamental change introduced by this Directive is that it determines the scope of financial regulation to all energy physically-settled derivatives traded on organised trading facilities (except for those already regulated under REMIT).

Last, but not least – conceived as a package of measures to be implemented together with MiFID II were also the relevant safeguard clauses on market abuse prevention, incorporated into the Regulation with an identical title (Regulation on Market Abuse or MAR).

The new financial regulation concerning energy traders

Although the entry into force of the MiFID II provisions was postponed until January 2018, parts of its requirements were already applied to energy traders in Bulgaria. The first step in this respect was the latest amendments to the Public Offering of Securities Act on June 3, 2016 , which introduced the requirement that those entities publicly disclose their financial status on a regular basis, should energy traders fall under the scope of applicability of the Energy Act (not only the licensees). This procedure is very similar to the one already applied to public companies and the remaining securities issuers.

As of September 30, 2016, an entirely new law, known as the Law on the Measures against Market Abuse in Financial Instruments (LMAMAFI)  repealing the current law, entered into force. The bill aims to transpose the measures implementing MAR into national legislation. It defines the Bulgarian Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) supervising powers and determines, among others, the administrative sanctions and other measures in case of violations of MAR by Bulgarian entities . The LMAMAFI is to be applied together with the provisions of MAR, having direct effect in Bulgaria since July, 3 2016.

The new bill directly affects: (i) the regulated markets and energy derivatives issuers traded, admitted to trading on a regulated market or for which a request for admission to trade on a regulated market or multilateral trading facility has been made (as of 2018 the organized trading facilities will be also included), and (ii) large installations, regulated by the Emission Trading System and participating in the emission allowances market. In addition , its rules are also applicable to entities trading with spot commodity contracts which may have an effect on the price or value of a financial instrument traded on a regulated market due to the tight interrelation between the spot markets and their similar market of derivatives. The wholesale energy products already regulated by REMIT are explicitly excluded from the scope of MAR .

The implications for the energy traders

The new law obliges energy traders, as it does financial corporations, to develop and implement specific procedures for market manipulation prohibition and unlawful disclosure of inside information and financial instruments market manipulation. Their governing bodies need to adopt those new procedures no later than December 30, 2016.

The LMAMAFI provides for new rules on the development of special communication channels for the reporting of violations, including reporting on improper behaviour by persons considered to be capable of actions related to market abuse (whistle blowing).

The energy traders, in their capacity as employers, will be required to ensure the protection of the rights and personal data of the personnel who would be willing to report on infringements. Further elaboration of specific provisions for (i) the protection of the employees and the cooperation between the authorities engaged with the protection of those employees and (ii) the procedures for the establishment of secure communication channels for the reporting of infringements will likely be introduced via an ordinance of the Council of Ministers to be adopted in near future.

We will keep you informed about further expected legislative amendments.

This text is not a legal pronouncement and does not represent counsel regarding a concrete situation or a subject. Due to its limited scope, this text should not be considered a comprehensive treatment of the topic covered.

If you would like to receive more information concerning the potential impact of new financial regulations on your business, please contact us and follow our publications.

Read the full text

Download PDF
1 February 2019

The Bulgarian traders of energy products are facing the market abuse regulation

Effective as of the end of September 2016, Bulgarian traders of energy products must comply with market abuse prevention requirements....

Read more
1 February 2019

Significant improvements in the Ukrainian merger filing process

On 20 September 2016, the Ukrainian competition authority (the "AMC") announced the extension of its so-called amnesty program for merger control violations for another six months....

Read more
1 February 2019

Mandatory electronic mailboxes for legal entities

As of 1 August 2016, the Slovak Republic instituted the mandatory use of electronic mailboxes (accounts) (hereinafter the "emails") for legal entities. The obligation was introduced by Act No. 305/2013 Coll., on e-Government as amended (hereinafter the "Act on e-Government"), whereby the respective state authority was obliged to activate the emails by 1 August 2016....

Read more
1 February 2019

Mandatory RES-E quota benefiting from the GC support scheme was approved

In a shift in green energy policy in Romania, the mandatory RES-Electricity quota benefiting from the green certificate support scheme was approved yesterday by the government....

Read more
1 February 2019

Prohibited advertising in FBIH

New Law in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina aims to regulate protection of merchants from prohibited advertising....

Read more
1 February 2019

The Serbian commission for the protection of competition publicises its aftermarkets study

The Serbian Commission for the Protection of Competition recently published a market study in which it assessed the state of competition in after-sales services for motor vehicles and home appliances in 2015. The Commission also invited all interested parties to comment on the results of the study by 31 December 2016....

Read more
1 February 2019

Slovakia: Public procurement

Do you take part in public tender procedures and conclude (concession) contracts or framework agreements with public contracting authorities? Do you receive financial means from the state budget, from EU funds or state aid? Do you use state property?...

Read more
1 February 2019

New strict regulation on Best Price Clauses

As of 01 January 2017 amendments of the Austrian Act against Unfair Competition (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, UWG) and of the Price Labelling Act (Preisauszeichnungsgesetz) come into force, which ban Best Price Clauses as "aggressive business practices" and declaring such contractual provisions as void. This legislative change is a reaction to concerns also raised by authorities in other countries across the EU (eg decision of the German Federal Cartel Office dated 23 December 2015). In France similar provisions are already in place....

Read more
1 February 2019

Wolf Theiss contributes to the Amcham guidelines on third parties anti-corruption due diligence

Wolf Theiss contributed to the preparation of the AmCham Guidelines on Third Parties Anti-Corruption Due Diligence...

Read more
1 February 2019

Vergaberecht: Verlängerung der Schwellenwerteverordnung

Verlängerung der Schwellenwerteverordnung BGBL II 2016/250, ausgegeben am 13.9.2016...

Read more
1 February 2019

New employee record rulebook adopted

On 18 November 2016, the Rulebook on the Content and Manner of Keeping Records on Employees and Other Persons Engaged in work (Rulebook) has been published in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) with the aim of regulating in detail the employers' obligation to maintain relevant records, as provided for in Article 43 of the FBiH labor law (Law). The Rulebook shall enter into force on 26 November 2016....

Read more
1 February 2019

Protecting your Know-How: the EU Directive on Trade Secrets of 8 June 2016

Businesses rely on protecting their intellectual property, know-how and trade secrets so that they can bring their innovations to market in fair circumstances and without undue risk. When these secrets fall into the wrong hands, a hard-won market advantage can be damaged or lost. Wolf Theiss experts Partner Georg Kresbach and Senior Associate Maren Jergolla-Wagner analyse here the new Directive and discuss how a trade secret is defined, the kinds of recourse that trade secret holders have to act against unlawful use or disclosure, including judicial redress, and issues concerning transposing the Directive into Austrian law....

Read more