A recent legislative amendment to Law no. 17/2014, concerning certain measures regulating the sale of extra muros agricultural land, which also amends Law no. 268/2001 on the privatisation of companies managing public and private state-owned agricultural land and the establishment of the State Domains Agency (“Law 17”), has been proposed in the Romanian Senate. This amendment aims to introduce a new category of pre-emptors: owners of land adjoining extra muros arable land, regardless of the location within or outside city limits and regardless of the land use category.
The draft is subject to debate and approval and will be sent to the Chamber of Deputies, the decision-making chamber.
Although the legislator presented the change as a clarification to the existing legal framework, the proposed amendment appears to deviate from the law’s purpose, which is to consolidate agricultural land to further facilitate farm growth and establish economically viable holdings, not to artificially regulate additional pre-emptor categories.
It remains uncertain whether the legislative proposal will be vulnerable to criticism, but it is likely, as the proposal does not seem to address the current social concerns underpinning Law 17 in its present form. This specifically refers to the latest amendments to Law 17, which have generated a transactional deadlock by overly restrictive interpretations that inhibit the free sale of farmland. This is contrary to the spirit of the law, which implicitly prohibits the unrestricted sale of extra muros agricultural land.
Over-regulation of pre-emptor categories may negatively impact the law’s purpose, potentially causing further practical difficulties in applying Law 17, thus signalling a move away from legislative stability and efficiency.
The proposed amendment artificially extends the categories of pre-emptors. Existing categories are regulated based on subjective criteria, such as family relationships, along with objective criteria, such as favouring agricultural investments and holdings for farmland investors, owners of neighbouring farmland, public authorities/institutions involved in the farmland sector and encouraging agricultural activities/production among young people.
Granting a pre-emption right to the anticipated category (neighbours of farmland, irrespective of intra muros ownership or neighbouring land use category) within the proposed legislative change does not align with these criteria. If the owner of intra muros non-agricultural land adjacent to extra muros arable land seeks to purchase the farmland, it is unclear how such an acquisition would benefit agricultural development.
The law already provides sufficient mechanisms for neighbours to obtain ownership rights over extra muros plots of land, either by exercising the pre-emption right, through acquisition as potential buyers or if no pre-emptor or potential buyer expresses interest, through a free sale to a non-pre-emptor or potential buyer.
If it were accepted that owners of neighbouring intra muros land should have a pre-emption right, these beneficiaries would find themselves in a superior position compared to potential buyers, who face more restrictive conditions when acquiring ownership of extra muros arable land.
De lege ferenda, owners of neighbouring intra muros land may benefit from a pre-emption right if, for instance:
a) They undertake the obligation to include the neighbouring land into the extra muros plot and/or use said land for agricultural activities or investments permitted by law; or
b) They fulfil similar criteria to the category of potential buyers or young farmers, thus reducing any potential discrimination.
Furthermore, for the sake of legislative transparency and harmony, the amendment should explicitly address the permitted use of extra muros arable land following acquisition by intra muros neighbours, in order to avoid a legislative void that may generate confusion and multiple interpretations.
Download the article in English
New Category of Pre-emptors Involved in the Purchase of Extra Muros Farmland?
A recent legislative amendment to Law no. 17/2014, concerning certain measures regulating the sale of extra muros agricultural land, which also amends Law no. 268/2001 on the privatisation of companies managing public and private state-owned agricultural land and the establishment of the State Domains Agency (“Law 17”), has been proposed in the Romanian Senate. This […]...
In-Depth Review — International Arbitration: Chapter on Austria
Our colleagues Alexander Zollner and Philipp Theiler have contributed their expertise to the 15th edition of the “In-Depth Review – International Arbitration” by Lexology. Their chapter offers comprehensive insights into the Austrian Arbitration Act and its alignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law, highlighting Austria’s robust legal framework for arbitration. This significant contribution underscores our […]...
Urlaubsrecht in Österreich
Der Sommer steht unmittelbar vor der Tür. Daher sprechen Isabel Firneis und Magdalena Ziembicka über das Top-Thema der Saison – Urlaubsrecht in Österreich. Vacation Episode summary With summer just around the corner, Isabel Firneis and Magdalena Ziembicka talk about the hot topic of the season – vacation. In addition to the basics of annual leave […]...
Employment Brief: Bulgaria switches to electronic labour records
Bulgaria has outlined a procedure for electronic labour records (ELR) in a draft Ordinance published for public consultations on 21 May 2024.The switch to ELR will take effect on 1 June 2025, as stipulated by recent amendments to the Labour Code. This represents a significant step in the long-awaited digitalisation of employment records. According to the […]...
Wolf Theiss advises Bulgarian-American Credit Bank AD on its issue and listing of Subordinated Notes
Vienna, 24 June 2024 – Wolf Theiss advised Bulgarian-American Credit Bank AD as issuer on its issue and listing of EUR 15,000,000 8.00% 2024-2034 Subordinated (Tier 2) Notes (BG2100017248). On 3 June 2024, Bulgarian-American Credit Bank AD successfully closed the private placement of Subordinated Notes in the aggregate principal amount of EUR 15 million in order to strengthen […]...
Digital Law: GDPR and EU Digital Strategy
Our latest episode of the Wolf Theiss Soundshot Podcast is the fifth one in our “Digital Law” series. In this episode, Klara Miletic and Flavius Florea discuss the interrelationship of GDPR and various legal acts under the EU’s Digital Strategy. This strategy promotes the flow and access to different types of data, including personal, non-personal, […]...
Wolf Theiss advises International Finance Corporation (IFC) on the subscription of RSD 2,300,000,000 MREL bonds
Vienna, 20 June 2024 – Wolf Theiss advised International Finance Corporation (IFC) on the first subscription of MREL bonds in the Serbian capital market issued by Raiffeisen banka a.d. Beograd. Raiffeisen banka a.d. Beograd successfully closed the issue of long-term MREL bonds in the aggregate principal amount of RSD 6,000,000,000. The MREL bonds have a maturity of four […]...
Resilience in Transformation
Solutions for a shifting landscape In a world marked by constant change, resilience is key. Join Wolf Theiss in navigating the challenges of a shifting legal landscape. Explore innovative solutions to ensure resilience in the face of transformation. Our legal experts will guide you through strategic approaches for adapting to change and emerging stronger. Regulatory […]...
Life Sciences Bulletin: New public foundation to oversee exceptional drug funding in Hungary as of 2025
Commencing in 2025, the Batthyány-Strattmann László Foundation will assume the responsibility of managing applications for exceptional drug funding in Hungary. The foundation itself will receive its annual funding from the government, in accordance with the latest amendment to Act LXXXIII of 1997 on compulsory health insurance benefits. This represents a significant change to the management […]...
Streiten oder Vergleichen?
Diese Frage wird einem Anwalt bei arbeitsrechtlichen Streitigkeiten sehr oft gestellt. Die Antwort ist nicht einfach und es gibt kein “One-Size-Fits-All” Konzept. In dieser Folge sprechen Ralf Peschek und Dorothea Arlt über verschiedene Faktoren, die bei der Entscheidung, ein Gerichtsverfahren zu beginnen und allenfalls bis zum Ende durchzuhalten oder sich mit der Gegenseite zu vergleichen, […]...
Vergabeverfahren ist nicht gleich Vergabeverfahren
Die Verfahrensarten im Vergaberecht und woher ich als Auftraggeber weiß, welches Verfahren zu mir “passt” In dieser Folge unseres Vergaberecht-Podcasts diskutieren Manfred Essletzbichler und Johann Hwezda die unterschiedlichen Vergabeverfahren, ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile und geben Tipps, wie Auftraggeber das geeignete Verfahren auswählen können. Unsere Experten erläutern bekannte “Klassiker”, wie das offene Verfahren und das […]...
Ukrainian capital and commodity markets: enhancement to regulator’s powers and other regulatory developments
On 27 April 2024, the Law of Ukraine, titled “On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine ‘On State Regulation of Capital Markets and Organised Commodity Markets’ and Certain Other Statutory Acts of Ukraine Concerning Regulation and Supervision of Capital Markets and Organised Commodity Markets” (the Law), came into effect. As claimed by the Law’s authors, […]...